tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8203221.post113237828471465001..comments2023-09-07T06:32:12.677-07:00Comments on Richard Sprague: More lies about IraqRichard Spraguehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03470273961021829567noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8203221.post-1132496221855882702005-11-20T06:17:00.000-08:002005-11-20T06:17:00.000-08:00Bob, I appreciate your comments, so please don't t...Bob, I appreciate your comments, so please don't think I'm trying to offend you. Everyone in the world (including, I bet, you) was surprised Iraq had no WMD--so my point is that if Bush was a "liar", then so were the rest of us. In other words, like Clinton, Bush sincerely believed at the time that some of the intelligence was credible.<BR/><BR/>But I'd love to hear your answer to my real question: how would it have turned out if we had followed your advice? Would Iraq still be under sanctions? Would Saddam be in power? Would he have kicked the inspectors out again once they gave him a clean bill of health? Would he have restarted his programs? Would Al Qaeda have left us alone--no Madrid, no London subway bombings?Richard Spraguehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03470273961021829567noreply@blogger.com